THIRD FINGER FUND LLC by, @BMDPicksHorses

Brandon M. Dolin

Website of @BMDPICKSHORSES BETS AND BETTING ADVICE. Soon to be sole manager of The 3rd Finger Fund LLC a NV Betting Entity ; Horse Racing & Sports Betting.

The Handicapper's Library

BRIS PEDIGREE RATINGS F.A.Q.

WHAT DO THE BRIS PEDIGREE RATINGS MEASURE?

The Fast (Dirt) Pedigree rating measures the quality and suitability of the horse's breeding for races run on the dirt.

The Wet Pedigree rating measures the quality and suitability of the horse's breeding for races run over a wet dirt surface.

The Distance Pedigree rating measures the overall quality and suitability of the horse's breeding for races run at today's distance.

The Turf Pedigree rating measures the quality and suitability of the horse's breeding for races run on the turf.

HOW SHOULD I INTERPRET THE BRIS PEDIGREE RATINGS?

While the higher Pedigree Ratings are generally preferred, the key is to not simply look for the highest rated horse. Instead, value oriented handicappers are encouraged to compare the rating of a horse at today's distance (or surface) to his/her other pedigree ratings. Ask yourself if the relationship between the pedigree ratings of a horse suggest he/she will improve or decline at today's distance/surface.

In turf races, look for those horses whose TURF Pedigree Rating is higher than his/her FAST dirt Pedigree Rating. These horses, based on the performances of other horses with similiar breeding, are well suited to the grass and often improve considerably when trying the grass.

In dirt races, look for those horses whose DIST Pedigree Rating is higher than his/her overall FAST dirt Pedigree Rating. These horses, based on the performances of other horses with similiar breeding, are well suited to today's distance and often show substantial improvement when today's distance is considerably shorter or longer than his/her other races.

In races run on a wet track, look for those horses whose WET Pedigree Rating is higher than their FAST dirt Pedigree Rating. These horses, based on the performances of other horses with similiar breeding, are well suited to a wet track and often improve dramatically when running on a wet track.

HOW ARE THE BRIS PEDIGREE RATINGS CALCULATED?

Based on an analysis of hundreds of thousands of starts in North America, each start of all offspring from the Sire, Dam, and Damsire are evaluated and measured for their individual racing aptitudes and preferences. Unlike other pedigree ratings which merely reflect win percentages or earnings, the BRIS Pedigree Ratings utilize a vast array of performance rating tools (Speed Ratings, Class Ratings, Power Ratings, etc.) to accurately measure the actual improvement or decline each offspring displayed at different distances and surfaces. The net result of this exhaustive compilation is the most accurate, comprehensive, and predictive pedigree raitngs available to handicappers.

WHAT DO THE '?' AND '*' SYMBOLS MEAN?

When the BRIS Pedigree Ratings are largely based on small sample sizes, a '?' or '*' symbol is given. Those rated with an '*' have the smallest sample size.

WHEN SHOULD I USE THE BRIS PEDIGREE RATINGS?

The BRIS Pedigree Ratings are most valuable when horses are being asked to attempt something they have never done before(eg., Making their first career start, Trying a new distance, Switching to turf, Running on an off track for the first time, etc.).

WHERE CAN I FIND THE BRIS PEDIGREE RATINGS ?

Available EXCLUSIVELY in BRIS PDF Past Performances (Premium Plus PP's, Ultimate PP's, and Quick Play PP's), the ratings can be found next to the horse's career record for Fast, Wet, Distance, and Turf.

The Handicapper's Library contains other helpful reference documents.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

brisnet Copyright 2002 Bloodstock Research Information Services www.brisnet.com (800) 354-9206

The Handicapper's Library

USING PEDIGREE STATISTICS FOR HANDICAPPING

The pedigree statistics in The Handicapper's Database for maiden and turf races are extremely powerful, when used properly and should be used only BEFORE a runner establishes its preferences for distance and surface conditions. Once a runner demonstrates its preferences, disregard the runner's pedigree for handicapping.

AN EXAMPLE OF PEDIGREE STATISTICS ON A RUNNER:

RECKLESS ROSE, 21FEB85 114, $ 10,500, JKY: FP FUENTES
 BY THE IRISH LORD (333fls)(75%wnr)(44%2ywnr)(16%1st)(17%mud)(awd6.3)(spi1.79)
 - GO SOUTH (p)(4str)(3wnrs)(1sw)(25%2ywnrs)(dpi3.88)
EXPLANATIONS OF THE NUMERICAL INDEXES & RATINGS

STANDARD STARTS INDEX (SSI)

A numerical racing index based on average earnings per start of a runner in North America. It allows a comparison of racing performance of horses regardless of their year of birth or sex. The computation of the SSI takes into account inflation and the lower earning potential of fillies. The SSI is calculated by taking all the foals born in a given year and determining that crop's average earnings per start for each year that crop raced, calculating colts and fillies separately. A runner's SSI is no longer recalculated after five years of racing.

For example, the average earnings per start at two for all colts foaled in 1960 was $400; and the average earnings per start at two for all fillies foaled in 1960 was $283. Thus, a colt foaled in 1960 with average earnings per start at two of $400 has an SSI of 1.00. And a filly foaled in 1960 with average earnings per start at two of $283 also has an SSI of 1.00. Both the colt and filly have the same SSI due to the higher lifetime earning expectancy of colts.

A runner with an index of 1.00 is considered to be of the same caliber as all other runners with indexes of 1.00 regardless of the year foaled or sex. Thus, a colt foaled in 1930 which had an average per start of $94 and an SSI of 1.00 for his crop and sex would be considered of the same caliber as a colt foaled in 1960 with an average earnings per start of $400 and an SSI of 1.00.

DAM'S PRODUCTION INDEX (DPI)

The DPI indicates the average racing class of a mare's foals. It is an average of the SSIs of all of a mare's foals that have started three or more times in North America.

SIRE PRODUCTION INDEX (SPI)

The SPI indicates the average racing class of a stallion's foals. It is an average of the SSIs of all of a stallion's foals that have started three or more times in North America. This can be subdivided by sex of the foals as well, comparing the average SSI of his colts with that of his fillies.

THE FIRST LINE CONTAINS RUNNER INFORMATION:
"RECKLESS ROSE"   = THE RUNNER'S NAME

"21FEB85"         = THE RUNNER'S FOALING DATE
                    By   knowing   the   actual  birthdates  of  two-year-olds,
                    handicappers  have  an  edge  at  the betting windows.  The
                    "early"  foals  (Jan-Mar)  have a tremendous advantage over
                    "late" foals, due to their maturity advantage.

"114"             = ASSIGNED WEIGHT FOR THE RACE ENTERED

"$10,500"         = HIGHEST PUBLIC AUCTION PRICE

"JKY: FP FUENTES" = JOCKEY FOR THE RACE ENTERED
THE SECOND LINE CONTAINS SIRE STATISTICS:
"THE IRISH LORD"  = THE RUNNER'S SIRE'S NAME

(333fls)          = THE NUMBER OF FOALS BY THE SIRE
                    Bloodstock  Research recommends that handicappers demand at
                    least  fifty  (50)  foals  by  a sire before weighting that
                    sire's  pedigree  statistics heavily.  This will insure the
                    reliability of the information.

                 Bloodstock Research Information Services, Inc.

(75%wnr)          = THE PERCENTAGE OF STARTERS TO HAVE WON AT LEAST ONE RACE BY
                    THE SIRE.
                    The higher the %wnr the better.

(44%2ywnr)         = THE PERCENTAGE OF 2-YEAR-OLD STARTERS TO HAVE WON AT LEAST
                    ONE RACE
                    In two-year-old races, prefer runners with a high "%2ywnr".

(16%1st)          = WIN PERCENTAGE OF THE SIRE'S FIRST-TIME STARTERS
                    Any  first-time starter with a %1st greater than 15% should
                    be  considered  a  threat  to  win at first asking.  Is the
                    runner  ready? Check  the  runner's  workout  tab  and  the
                    trainer's   competence   with   first-time  starters.    In
                    addition,  the handicapper should look for a leading jockey
                    or stable rider.

 NOTE: AFTER A RUNNER HAS RACED, DO NOT USE THE %1ST IN YOUR HANDICAPPING.

(17%MUD)          = THE WIN PERCENTAGE OF MUD STARTS BY THE SIRE
                    If  a  runner hasn't yet demonstrated a liking or disliking
                    for  mud  and  today's  track  is  muddy, use the "%mud" to
                    predict  the runner's preference.  Prefer runners with high
                    "%mud" percentages.

(AWD6.3)             = THE AVERAGE WINNING DISTANCE (IN FURLONGS) OF THE SIRE'S
                    WINNERS
                    Among  first-time  starters  entered  in  sprints, look for
                    runners  with  an  AWD close to distance of the race you're
                    handicapping,  but  prefer  AWDs shorter than the distance.
                    These  first-time  starters are the most likely to show the
                    early  speed  that  dominates these races.  If a first-time
                    starter's AWD is larger than desired (ie., greater than
                    6.5  in  a 6 furlong sprint), the handicapper should become
                    strict  on  other  measures of early speed - in particular,
                    demand  a  relatively  high  %1st and/or at least one short
                    work out at three or four furlongs indicating "strong
                    speed".    Generally,  workouts  of  about  12  seconds per
                    furlong   is  a  good  indication  of  speed.  For  runners
                    "stretching  out"  (sprint  to  route)  for the first time,
                    prefer  those  runners whose sire shows an AWD of seven (7)
                    furlongs or more.  These first time "stretch outs" are more
                    likely  to  show  the  stamina  it takes to cover the extra
                    distance in these races.

(spi1.79)           = The Sire's Production Index is a numerical representation
                    of  a  sire's  class  and  consistency, based upon relative
                    earnings.  The calculation of the SPI involves the ratio of
                    a sire's colts and fillies average earnings per start for a
                    year,  respectively, and the average earnings per start for
                    all  colts  and  fillies,  respectively, for the same year.
                    The  average  SPI  of  all sires is 1.00. The SPI is useful
                    with first-time starters and first-time stretchouts.
                    While  the  SPI  is  not as powerful as some other pedigree
                    statistics (%1st and awd), it is quite helpful when used to
                    separate otherwise equal first-time starters and first-time
                    stretchouts.  
                Bloodstock Research Information Services, Inc.
ON TURF RACES THE FOLLOWING STATISTICS WILL ALSO APPEAR:
           
( %tfwins)       =  WIN PERCENTAGE OF THE SIRE'S STARTERS ON THE TURF
                    %tfwins  is best used to evaluate first-time turf starters.
                    %tfwins  combined  with %1sttf is a reliable indicator of a
                    runner's probable liking/disliking to the turf.  Obviously,
                    the handicapper prefers the higher percentages.

( %1sttf)        =  WIN PERCENTAGE OF THE SIRE'S FIRST-TIME TURF STARTERS
                    Any  first-time turf starter with a %1sttf greater than 15%
                    should  be  considered a threat - regardless of recent form
                    on the dirt.
THE THIRD LINE CONTAINS DAM STATISTICS:

Dam statistics, in general, should be weighted considerably less than sire statistics. The lighter weighting of dams is justified simply on the basis of numbers. Since a stallion may sire hundreds of foals, his statistics are far more reliable than that of a dam who produces just a few. Still, dam statistics can be helpful (ie., to separate otherwise equal first-time starters).

"GO SOUTH"      =   THE DAM'S NAME

(p)             =   THE  DAM'S  RACE PERFORMANCE.  The best race performance of
                    GO SOUTH was "placed". Prefer in descending order:
                    sw -  stakes winner
                    sp -  stakes placed
                     w -  winner
                     p -  placed
                    up -  unplaced
                    ur -  unraced

(4str)          =   THE NUMBER OF FOALS WHICH STARTED AT LEAST ONE RACE
                    Demand  at  least  4  starters  out  of  the  Dam to assure
                    reliability of the information.

(3wnrs)         =   THE NUMBER OF STARTERS THAT HAVE WON A RACE
                    Obviously, the more winners the better.

(1sw)           =   THE NUMBER OF STARTERS THAT HAVE WON A STAKES RACE
                    Again, the more stakes winners the better.

(25%2ywnrs)     =   THE  PERCENTAGE  OF  STARTERS  THAT  WON  A  ONE  RACE AS A
                    TWO-YEAR-OLD.
                    In  two-year-old  races,  runners with a high "%2ywnrs" are
                    preferred.

(dpi3.88)       =   DAM'S PRODUCTION INDEX (SEE SIRE PRODUCTION INDEX FOR
                    EXPLANATION)
                    Like  the  SPI,  the  DPI  is  useful  for separating young
                    runners  with  little or no racing record.  The handicapper
                    prefers runners with the higher DPI.
                 Bloodstock Research Information Services, Inc.
APPLICATIONS OF PEDIGREEE STATISTICS:
******************************************************************************
*                                                                            *
*    DANCING LINDSAY, 86 117, TR: GOSDEN JOHN H M, JKY: CA BLACK             *
*                                                                            *
*  BY LILOY (FR) (193fls)(51%wnr)(14%2ywnr)(2%1st)(13%mud)(awd7.7)(spi2.15)  *
*   - BOLD BRAT (sw)(4str)(1wnrs)(1sw)(0%2ywnrs)(dpi2.01)                    *
* 25Jy88HOL06 6f     FT 03 5 1/4   Gosden J Md Sp Wt  111.5   111.9 57 26000 *
* 10Jy88HOL04 6f     FT 09 19      Gosden J Md Sp Wt  111.7   107.8 44 26000 *
*                                                                            *
******************************************************************************
In two-year-old maiden races at a mile (or more), handicappers should concentrate their analysis of the race on those runners which figure to benefit at the distance. With most two-year-old-races carded at sprint distances, many two-year-olds bred for the longer distances must enter sprints until a race at a favorable distance is carded.

The sixth race at Del Mar on September 7, 1988 was at one mile for two-year-old maidens. Handicapper's with Bloodstock Research's pedigree information could have easily spotted a tremendous overlay. In a race filled with runners stretching out for the first time in their young careers, Dancing Lindsay figured to benefit the most from the added distance - as evidenced by an AWD of 7.7. This lightly raced filly was exiting a good effort at six furlongs in only her second career start. Placed at a more comfortable distance, she figured to show more improvement. With the generous odds of 12.5 to 1, Dancing Lindsay was a license to steal. She won easily paying $27.00.

*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
*  DECOY, 86 118, JKY: A CORDERO JR                                           *
*                                                                             *
*BY CLEVER TRICK (241fls)(72%wnr)(50%2ywnr)(21%1st)(16%mud)(awd6.5)(spi2.28)  *
* - BRIDGE TABLE (ur)(3str)(3wnrs)(0sw)(33%2ywnrs)(dpi3.13)                   *
*                      No Previous North American Starts                      *
*                                                                             *
*******************************************************************************
Two-year-old maiden races are dominated by runners with early speed. Runners expected to be up front early combined with moderate to high odds present handicappers with solid investment opportunities.

The fourth race at Belmont on September 7, 1988 was a 5 1/2 furlong sprint for maiden two-year-olds. This race powerfully demonstrates the value of Bloodstock Research's pedigree information. Decoy, a first-time starter, was obviously well bred - as indicated by a SPI of 2.28 and a DPI of 3.13 . And more importantly his pedigree statistics indicated an ability to win at first asking - as indicated by a %1st of 21%! The AWD of 6.5 is acceptable - especially, considering the high %1st and a 3f workout in :36 flat from the gate (printed in the Daily Racing Form).

At odds of nearly 8 to 1, Decoy was a solid investment and proved to be a profitable one. He went wire to wire, while never being threatened paying $17.80.

The Handicapper's Library contains other helpful reference documents.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

brisnet Copyright 2002 Bloodstock Research Information Services www.brisnet.com (800) 354-9206

The Handicapper's Library

SPEED & CLASS MOVING AVERAGES

Average Competitive Level (ACL) represents the level of competition a runner can successfully compete, on average, based on its previous in-the-money performances. Developed to not only recognize "class runners" while handicapping a race, but to also to evaluate the previous performances and current condition of all runners in a race.

This numerical representation is computed by taking the average Race Rating a runner has run in up to its last five in-the-money performances covering not more than a year period from the date of the race entered. In-the-money performances at the same distance/surface category as the race entered are emphasized through a sophisticated weighting procedure, and then are further adjusted to reflect the runners in-the-money performance and consistency.

To alert horsemen and handicappers of an Average Competitive Level computed solely on races NOT RUN at the same distance and surface as the race entered, it will appear in parentheses, for example: (114.2). IF A RUNNER HAS NEVER BEEN IN-THE-MONEY, IT WILL NOT HAVE AN AVERAGE COMPETITIVE LEVEL.

WHILE EXTENSIVE RESEARCH AND TESTING HAVE VERIFIED THE PRECISION OF THE AVERAGE COMPETITIVE LEVEL, PLEASE FOLLOW THE BELOW GUIDELINES WHILE USING IT TO CLAIM HORSES OR TO HANDICAP:

  • Use the Race Rating of previous races to determine the quality of fields, not the claiming price, purse, or conditions.

  • While handicapping a race, note the Race Ratings that each runner has competed in successfully - preferably under conditions similar to the race you are handicapping.

  • Use the Average Competitive Level as a tool to determine the current competitive level for all runners in the race. When confronted with young or lightly race runners, particularly two and three-year-old, which have recently run successfully in Race Ratings higher than their Average Competitive Level use those higher Race Ratings as the runner's current competitive level. By relating a runner's Average Competivie Level to the Race Rating of its current performances, these improving runners will standout.

  • Any runner, including the top Average Competitive Level rated runner, who has recently been unsuccessful in Race Ratings at the same level or below its Average Competitive Level without legitimate excuses (uncomfortable distance, footing, post position, pace, etc.) can usually be considered unfit. Do not consider a runner's Average Competitive Level to be its current competitive level.

  • Among young, lightly raced, developing runners advancing to higher levels for the first time, merit serious consideration to those who have just run "impressive" races. These can best be recognized by their manner of victory as well as the Speed Ratings earned.

  • In claiming races, beware of unusually large claiming price drops. Particularly those runners with apparent good form. These runners are heavily bet and are usually hurt. If a good claimer is dropping well below its Average Competitive Level, it's usually best to avoid it. Trainers don't give away $35,000 runners for $10,000.

  • Avoid a runner which has recently been unsuccessful without a legitimate excuse in Race Ratings that other runners in the race you are handicapping have handled successfully under the same similar conditions.

  • When evaluating the relationship of each runner's Average Competitive Level in comparison to its performances in recent Race Ratings don't isolate the likely winner based upon class alone; use Speed Ratings to separate the contenders identified by class. Be sure to analyze the Speed Ratings in the context that the ratings were earned (class, distance, footing, etc.).

  • Restrict the usage of Speed Rating to those runners which are not outclassed today. A runner which earned a big Speed Rating against weak competition cannot be expected to approach that figure when outclassed.

  • A fit runner with a significant Average Competitive Level advantage will consistently beat its rivals when incidental race factors (distance, footing, post position, pace, etc.), do not nullify its class advantages.

The Handicapper's Library contains other helpful reference documents.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

brisnet Copyright 2002 Bloodstock Research Information Services www.brisnet.com (800) 354-9206

The Handicapper's Library

DISTANCE/SURFACE CATEGORY

The term "DISTANCE/SURFACE CATEGORY" is used frequently throughout the explanations of Bloodstock Research's Ratings and must be defined before proceeding. Race, Class, and Speed Ratings, as well as basic handicapping principles used to bet or claim horses are based upon the evaluation of a runner's performance in the same "distance/surface category". The importance of this will be explained as you continue reading the explanations in this section.

	
	  Distances Are Divided Into Two Categories:
	  ==========================================
	   * Sprint - All races less than a mile.
	   * Route - All races greater than a mile.

	  Surfaces Are Divided Into Two Categories:
          =========================================
	   * Fast or Good Track Conditions
           * All Other Track Conditions

Before a runner qualifies as running at the same distance/surface category, its previous races must have been in the same surface and distance category and within one furlong of the race you are handicapping. (Exception: If the race you're evaluating or handicapping is 10 furlongs or longer.)

The Handicapper's Library contains other helpful reference documents.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

brisnet Copyright 2002 Bloodstock Research Information Services www.brisnet.com (800) 354-9206

The Handicapper's Library

Using Ultimate PP's to Your Advantage

by Les Instone

Let me open by saying . . . there is no short-cut to good handicapping! To become a good handicapper or to be good at anything, you need to learn everything you can and continue to learn from your experience.

The Ultimate Past Performances from Bloodstock Research gives you more information than the average bettor at the racetrack has available. That information gives you an advantage - IF and only if, you use the information effectively. Using this exclusive information will make quite a bit of difference in your bottom line.

One of the many mistakes made by novice handicappers is not learning from your previous experience. Go back through the Ultimate PP’s for the last week and highlight stats that could have pointed toward, not only the winner, but horses that were close (within 3 lengths) at the finish.

ANALYZING ULTIMATE PP’s

Starting at the top of a horse’s past performance, let’s first look at "the human factors" . . the jockey and trainer. Look for riders with at least a 12% win rate for the current year and for the current meet. I like a rider who has a higher win percentage for this meet compared to his overall percentage for the year. I also like to see a higher win percentage for the jockey when he or she rides for this particular trainer. Also, look at the rider’s win percent with horses of this running style. Some jockeys are better suited to a particular running style, and the statistics found in the Ultimate PP’s will show if this is the case.

Look at the trainer’s stats in the same manner. Pay particularly close attention to the trainer stats pertinent to this race. Trainers have strengths and weaknesses. For example, some professional handicappers recommend staying away from all horses laid off for 90 days or more, but this rule is too general. With BRIS Ultimate PP’s, you will find trainers that excel with horses off the long lay-off. This is just one of the many advantages you will have over the general betting public who would never bet such a runner. Watch for trainers that excel with specific trainer moves like "dirt - turf - dirt", "route to sprint", "2nd grass start", etc.

Next, let’s go to the Prime Power rating and ranking (located next to the career record). This is one rating per horse, and it is Bloodstock Research’s most predictive number. Prime Power employs a sophisticated algorithm to combine many factors -- pace, class, speed, form, etc. -- into one rating. While the number does pinpoint a high percentage of winners, it does not separate dirt and turf nor sprints and routes. It only points out how well this runner has been running recently regardless of surface and distance.

If a horse ranks high on the Prime Power rating but his last three races have been dirt sprints, it doesn’t mean very much if today’s race is nine furlongs on the grass. The same is true if the horse bled, had trouble in a race or caught a track he didn’t like (sloppy or muddy track, poor post, etc.). Be forgiving for a low ranking if the runner has not been competing at his correct distance and surface.

Let’s look at the career stats box. Two stats you must consider are the "distance" stats and this runner’s stats for this track. Some horses excel at certain distances, i.e., a horse may have a record of 3 - 3 - 0 - 0 at 7 furlongs but has been running and losing at 1 1/16 miles lately. If today’s race is 7 furlongs, you may have uncovered important data. Some horse love certain tracks and can’t earn a check on other tracks. If a horse has a record of 6 - 0 - 0 - 0 over this track, you can usually eliminate that runner.

Below the career stats, the BRIS Ultimate PP’s will show sire and dam statistics and sales information in all maiden and turf races. These stats can give you a big edge over other bettors. The sire statistics include the "AWD" - average winning distance - of all of the sire’s foals. An AWD of around 6.0 furlongs indicates a sprinter, whereas something near 6.7 to 6.8 f is a miler and 7.0 f or higher is a route horse. Be careful if the sire has only one or two crops to the races. These foals have not yet proven themselves, especially at longer distances.

Mud% indicates the success of the sire’s foals on muddy or sloppy tracks. Ten-percent is about average while 18% or higher is outstanding. The Mud% stat is more reliable if there are at least 30 mud starts shown.

If this is a turf race, you will also find the winning percentage for all of the sire’s foals on the turf and first time on the turf. 14% turf and 8% lstT (lst time turf) are average for a good turf sire. The higher the percentage, the better. Next is the sire’s "SPI" or Sire Production Index. This compares the average earnings of this sire’s foals to the national average which is an SPI of 1.00. If a sire has an SPI of 2.00, his foals have earned twice the national average.

BRIS has now added stats for the dam's sire (broodmare sire). These statistics can again help you with turf and mud stats, average winning distance and the SPI (Sire Production Index) of the dam's sire.

Now, lets look at the dam's statistics. BRIS has now added information as to the racing success of the dam. It will spell out if she was a stakes winner, winner, placed, unplaced or unraced. This information is only on maiden and turf races. If this is a turf race, see how many turf winners she has produced. All dam statistics are shown by number of winners rather than percentages because a mare usually produces only one foal a year while stallions may sire 40 or more foals per year. Check how many starters ("str") she has produced, number of winners ("w") and number of stakes winners ("sw"). The Dam’s Production Index ("dpi") is similar to the SPI with 1.00 being the national average.

BRIS Ultimate Past Performance lines include more information than other bettors will have available. The exclusive Race Rating ("RR") refers to how tough a field actually was for that race. Not all races for $25,000 claimers are equal. The BRIS Race Rating will show you which races were stronger (the higher the number - the tougher the race). The BRIS Class Rating ("CR") measures this horse’s performance in each individual race. Concentrate on races at or near today’s distance, preferably over this race track. These two figures will help separate contenders from pretenders.

The exclusive BRIS Pace Ratings is the best tool for finding the real speed in each race. Those not using these pace figs presume only horses that go right to the lead have speed. But BRIS Pace Ratings will be much more reliable. By looking at the BRIS Pace figures, you can easily determine a horse’s preferred running style and how fast they move early or late. "E1" is the first call BRIS Pace figure; "E2" is the second call figure; and "LP" is the late pace rating from the second call to the finish. One length equals two points in all BRIS Pace figures.

Take a step backward and notice the letter and number in parenthesis next to this horse’s name. The letter indicates the horse’s running style (E=Early; P=Presser; S=Sustained/Closer). The numeral is the Early Speed Points with a range of 0 to 8, with 8 being the highest or fastest early speed. Obviously, if there is a lone "E8" runner, he could go to the front and never look back. If there are three or four runners are in the E6 to E8 range, then the race may set up for a come-from-behind runner.

The bold number just to the right is the BRIS Speed figure. The BRIS Speed Rating already includes a track variant for that race as part of the number. So a horse that wins one 6 furlong race in 1:12 flat, can have a higher speed figure than another horse that wins in 1:11 3/5, despite the latter being a faster raw time. A 95 at Philadelphia Park is equal to a 95 at Saratoga. BRIS Speed Ratings have a progressive scale compared to beaten lengths. At 6 furlongs, one length equals 1.66 points; at 7 furlongs = 1.42 points; at 8 furlongs = 1.26 points; 9 furlongs = 1.12 points; and at 10 furlongs one length = 1 point.

USING TRACK BIAS STATS & RACE SUMMARY

Some tracks and turf courses have a consistent track bias but any track bias can change - depending on many factors . . . especially weather. The BRIS Track Bias Stats will point out the Running Style and Post Position bias for the meet (left side) and for the last week (right side). If there have been 5 or less races in the last week at the distance, more emphasis should be placed on the full meet stats to the left. What should jump off the page are the "+" (which indicates this stat is higher than average) or a "++" (which indicates this stat is extremely successful). Check the "% Wire" which indicates the percentage of wire to wire winners at this distance. Then check the success rate of the running styles and post positions.

The Race Summary section is good to glance at to see which horses have been doing well lately. Horses with the speed figure surrounded by asterisks indicate this runner has two or more races within the last 90 days at today’s distance and surface. This is the most reliable information. Horses with parenthesis around the figure (which indicates no races within the last 90 days and/or this distance) and horses with no asterisks or parentheses (which indicate only one race within the last 90 days at this distance) need to be researched further to determine if they are a contender in today’s race.

The columns below are also good references to determine contenders vs. pretenders. Glance at the columns "Speed Last Race", "Early Pace Last Race", and "Late Pace Last Race" which are for the most recent race regardless of surface and distance. If that race was at a different distance or surface, a high figure here can indicate a horse that could continue to improve. A high ranking under "Current Class", "Average Class Last 3", and "Prime Power" can also point you to the contenders.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

brisnet Copyright 2002 Bloodstock Research Information Services www.brisnet.com (800) 354-9206

The Handicapper's Library

HELPFUL HINTS FOR USING THE

INSIDER PICKS AND POWER PLAYS

by Les Instone

As more sophisticated, disciplined handicappers know - there is no short-cut to good handicapping. There is no single handicapping factor that you can look at and say "this is the winner right here". Instead, there are many factors to consider when handicapping and it's the ones you don't use or don't know how to use, that can beat you at the race track.

INSIDER PICKS AND POWER PLAYS from BRIS provides many handicapping factors that the general public doesn't have access to. Using these factors effectively will give the user an advantage over your competition - other bettors.

The factors or "angles" in INSIDER PICKS AND POWER PLAYS are:

  • Blue Chip Trainer Plays
  • Sharp and Ready Runners
  • Hot Trainers
  • Hot Jockeys
  • Hot Trainer/Jockey Combos
  • Exiting a Key Race
  • Ship-In Trainer
  • Clocker Specials
  • Horses For Courses
  • Distance Specialists

Look down the right side of the page under the caption "Power Play Angles". You will see the angles for the horses in each race. Let's look at the angles and what they mean and how to use them effectively.

"BLUE CHIP TRAINER PLAYS" means this trainer is very strong at a handicapping angle which is detailed in the next section of the INSIDER PICKS AND POWER PLAYS. These point out the fact this trainer wins a high percentage under certain conditions with his runners. These may include Debut MdnSpWt (Maiden Special Weights), 2nd career start, 31-90 days away (layoff), 90+ days away, route to sprint, dirt to turf, 1st at route, beaten favorite, down one class, winner last race, shipper, etc. You MUST recognize that trainers have strengths and weaknesses and knowing those strengths and weaknesses can make quite a bit of difference. Some trainers may win 17% of their overall starts but may be 3% with horses going a route for the first time. Another trainer may be below average overall winning only 7% of his total starts but may hit with 23% debut runners (1st time starters). These specific trainer angles are very lucrative giving YOU a big edge.

"SHARP AND READY" horses in today highlight any horse that has a significant BRIS speed and BRIS class advantage over the others in this field. These horses should stand out but at times can offer good value when overlooked by John Q. Public who doesn't have this information.

"HOT TRAINERS" points out trainers who have been doing very well during the last 14 days while "HOT JOCKEYS" highlights hot riders in the last 7 days (jockeys have more mounts than trainers have horses entered). "HOT TRAINER/JOCKEY COMBOS" also looks at the last 14 days. This last particular stat is crucial because some trainers will use certain jockeys when they have a better shot at winning and give other riders the mount as a favor or payback maybe for exercising horses in the morning or some other reason. But when a horse is well-intended to win, you'll see a high percentage for the trainer/jockey combo (10-12% would be just average).

"EXITING A KEY RACE" lets you know that two or more horses from this runner's previous race have already come back to win their next start. A "possible" key race indicates only one other runner from that previous race has come back to win so far. When several horses come back to win, that is a clear indicator that the previous race was very tough. A horse that finished 5th in a "key race" may actually be better than a horse that was second in a race where no other horses have come out of that race to win their next start. Check the BRIS Race Ratings on the Ultimate Past Performances to see whether this horse was above or near the Race Ratings of other horses in today's race.

"SHIP-IN TRAINER" highlights trainers that have already won at this meet with a "ship-in" horse and have a similar shipper entered in today's race. Some trainers do better than others when shipping in to a particular track. Watch for trainers that ship in to run against lesser competition in an effort to steal this race.

"CLOCKER SPECIALS" lists the fastest workouts in the last 7 days for horses running today. One stat not available anywhere else ranks the horses within their age group for this distance over the last 7 days. A 3-year-old may have had the third fastest work at 4 furlongs on a given day but that work could have been the fastest by any 3-year-old in the last 7 days. How else would you know this information?

"HORSES FOR COURSES" points out horses that have done especially well over this track and surface. Some horses just run better at certain tracks or over certain turf courses. And it's important to recognize that especially if it has been a long time since the last meet at this track. If this horse has not been doing well at another track, he could be rejuvenated when he steps foot over this surface.

"DISTANCE SPECIALISTS" are horses that have run especially well at this distance. Just as some horses like certain tracks, some horses love certain distances. Some horses can do great at 7 furlongs but can't win going 6 furlongs or a mile. If you see a horse that is a "Horse for the Course" and a "Distance Specialist" - you have found a very strong contender in this race.

Let's go back and look at the selections at the top of each race. The "Top 3" choices are computer-generated based on many factors including the INSIDER PICKS AND POWER PLAYS angles. These comprehensive selections are the top three horses to look at when you are handicapping today's race. The "Speed" selections ranks the top three based on recent BRIS speed figures. The BRIS Class rating determines the top 3 "Class" selections. And the top 3 "Pace" selections reflect runners with the fastest BRIS early pace ratings. These BRIS pace, speed and class ratings can be found in the Ultimate Past Performances.

The "Detailed" version of the INSIDER PICKS AND POWER PLAYS is just that - more detailed. For instance on the "Shipper Stats", it will detail a short list of trainers and their record with ship-ins and where they shipped from. Also see if the additional details for "Hot Trainers" and "Blue Chip Plays" will help you in uncovering that extra information that will help you do better at the track.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

brisnet Copyright 2002 Bloodstock Research Information Services www.brisnet.com (800) 354-9206

Comparing Single and Multiple Network Reports

Comparing Single and Multiple Network Reports

A common misunderstanding in the Neurax and Neurax Pro packages is how to compare the reports from a single network and the alternate format that print the picks of all five networks simultaneously. For clarity, all bold numbers are program numbers/post positions and all italics are finish order.

  Neural Network In Use: Bravo
  16-MAR-99 Race 2 at Gulfstream Park
  Maiden [$25,000] race at 6 furlongs on DIRT (SPRINT)
  4 yr olds only
  EXACTA & TRIFECTA, SECOND HALF OF DAILY DOUBLE
   
  Finish order (DRY track assumed):
          Pgm/PP Horse           Score Wodds Modds Rx Age Wgt Jockey
  Win:       6   NEEDS MORE TIME 29.74  2.36  4.00 L   4g 122 COA E M
  Place:     3   FOREVER REALITY 15.91  5.29  3.00 L   4g 122 FIRES E
  Show:      8   TUNERUPDOC      15.53  5.44  6.00 L   4c 122 NUNEZ E O
  Fourth:    9   DEFENSIVE LINE  11.21  7.92  5.00 L   4c 122 CHAVEZ J F
  5th:       1   BAROMETER        7.16 12.96 20.00 L   4c 122 CASTILLO O O
  6th:       10  WHIRLO           7.15 12.99  6.00 L   4g 122 BARBARAN H A
  7th:       2   EL PREGONERO     4.47 21.39  8.00     4c 120 TURNER T G
  8th:       7   BLADE THIRTEEN   4.46 21.41  8.00     4c 122 TORIBIO A R
  9th:       5   PARQUETRY        3.91 24.60 20.00     4c 122 VELEZ R I
  10th:      4   SILICA'S DREAM   3.91 24.60 15.00 L   4g 120 HOMEISTER R B JR

Here, in the single output, it is easy to see the finish order as the horses are ordered by their scores;

6-3-8-9-1-10-2-7-5-4. However the alternate format is a little more complex.

  16-MAR-99 Race 2 at Gulfstream Park
  Maiden [$25,000] race at 6 furlongs on DIRT (SPRINT)
  4 yr olds only
  EXACTA & TRIFECTA, SECOND HALF OF DAILY DOUBLE
   
  Horse ranking and scores (DRY track assumed):
  Pgm/PP Horse            Insight   Speed    Flow     Bravo    Gold   Modds
     1   BAROMETER        5- 8.54  5- 6.61  5- 8.20  5- 7.16  5- 7.97 20.00
     2   EL PREGONERO     7- 4.60  8- 4.04  7- 5.99  7- 4.47  6- 5.61  8.00
     3   FOREVER REALITY  3-13.51  1-22.18  3-17.01  2-15.91  3-13.42  3.00
     4   SILICA'S DREAM   8- 4.54  9- 3.97  9- 4.64 10- 3.91  9- 4.43 15.00
     5   PARQUETRY       10- 3.62 10- 2.68 10- 2.57  9- 3.91 10- 3.06 20.00
     6   NEEDS MORE TIME  1-30.87  2-21.85  1-26.57  1-29.74  1-36.52  4.00
     7   BLADE THIRTEEN   9- 3.63  7- 5.79  6- 6.68  8- 4.46  7- 4.95  8.00
     8   TUNERUPDOC       2-16.84  3-17.55  2-17.48  3-15.53  2-14.90  6.00
     9   DEFENSIVE LINE   4-10.25  4-15.22  4-10.79  4-11.21  4-10.45  5.00
     10  WHIRLO           6- 6.85  6- 5.86  8- 4.65  6- 7.15  8- 4.53  6.00

In this report, the horses are sorted by program number/post position. The '5' in the 'Bravo' column for the one horse, Barometer, means the 'Bravo' network ranked this horse fifth, matching the single network. Similarly, if we look at the horse ranked first by the single report, Needs More Time, we find a '1' in the 'Bravo' column.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

brisnet Copyright 2002 Bloodstock Research Information Services www.brisnet.com (800) 354-9206

about:reader?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brisnet.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fstatic.cgi%3Fpage%3Dincorporating_Sp1_and_dpi_into_handicapping_maiden_25Sep07

PEDIGREE HANDICAPPING

SEPTEMBER 22, 2007

Incorporating SPI and DPI into handicapping maiden races

by Tim Holland

One of the most difficult tasks that faces a handicapper is sorting out a field full of lightly raced two-year-olds. With sparse form lines, players are forced to concentrate on pedigrees, trainer angles and workouts.

Possibly the quickest and easiest way to mathematically assess a runner's pedigree is by glancing at the SPI (Sire Production Index) of the horse's sire and dam's sire, and the DPI (Dam Production Index) of the subject's dam found in the BRIS Past Performances. These figures indicate the average racing class of the stallion/mare's foals by averaging the SSI (Standard Starts Index which is a numerical index based on average earnings per start of a runner) of all of his/her runners. The SSI is a useful figure which allows a comparison of racing performances of horses in North America, regardless of their year of birth or sex, since it takes into account inflation and the lower-earning potential of fillies.

To illustrate the usefulness of these figures for a nine-day period (September 12-20), all two-year-old maidens making their first or second start over dirt or artificial surfaces were selected whose sire and dam's sire's SPIs and dam's DPIs met, or exceeded, the national average of 1.00. For first season sires that have not been represented by enough runners to produce a SPI, this figure was substituted by the percentage of first-time out winners representing the subject stallion, with a minimum of 10 percent used to "qualify." The second parameter was that the runner must be by a sire whose first-time starter stats met, or exceeded 10 percent which, even with second-time starters, ensures that the respective sire is passing on an acceptable level of precocity. The final requirement was that the runner's trainer must own a win rate of at least 10 percent with first, or second-time starters, whichever figure was applicable to the individual runner.

This test produced a total of 59 runners. Of these, a respectable 15 (25 percent) were winners and a flat bet on each produced a very slight loss. Most of these winners were well-fancied by their connections which brings up the additional importance of paying attention to the tote board when dealing with lightly raced individuals. Indeed, 12 of these runners started at 10-1 or higher, and none returned winners. Additionally, very short-priced horses are of little use to handicappers and in this series five juveniles were bet down to odds-on. Surprisingly, although four of these finished in the money, none were winners and by removing these two groups, the sample now contained 15 wins from 42 starts (36 percent win rate), which in theory would have produced a healthy profit.

Taking the figures a step further during this same time period studied, and it must be stressed that small samples must be used with care, there were six first or second-time starters seen who fit the above parameters but additionally whose sire, dam's sire and dam ranked at more than 2.00, or twice the national average.

Three of these six were winners, including Referee, a first-time starter on September 14 over the Polytrack at Turfway Park. Trained by Todd Pletcher, Referee is by Distorted Humor (SPI 3.09) and out of Officiate (by Deputy Minister [SPI 3.89]), who owns a DPI of 8.62 due to her first foal, Mo Cuishle (Saint Ballado), winning three of her eight starts, including the Monmouth Breeders' Cup Oaks (G3). Distorted Humor's offspring have been winning at a rate of 16 percent in their debut and Pletcher owns a 19 percent win rate with his first timers. Further investigation of the past performances revealed that the debutant cost $1.2 million as a yearling, the highest price for any of his sire's offspring that year, and Referee owned a superior worktab, including two bullets at Churchill Downs.

The only negative to Referee was his short price. However, it can be argued that with so many positives, and after assessing the relative weakness of the field he was facing, that the colt was still a decent bet at 1.40-1; a view which was reinforced when he won easily by nearly eight lengths.

Better value was found via Devereux, a second-time starter from the barn of Steve Asmussen. After the colt made a promising debut at Saratoga, Asmussen, who scores with 24 percent of his second-time runners, entered the son of Forestry (whose ability to pass on precocity is backed up by his 12 percent first time win rate) in a six-furlong maiden special weight at Belmont. With his sire's and dam sire's SPIs of 2.35 and 6.28, respectively, and his dam's DPI of 2.27, Devereux owned the pedigree and trainer stats to be considered a solid play, which he backed up with a three-length win and $8.80 mutuel.

The third winner with high pedigree figures was the Nick Zito representative Overandabeauty (by Grand Slam [14 percent first-time out]), who scored at second asking at Belmont last Sunday at odds of 2.65-1. A decent second in her debut, Overandabeauty's pedigree figures include her dam's impressive DPI of 32.09, earned by being the mother of Tapit, who won the 2004 Wood Memorial S.(G1). Zito excels with second time starters, reflected in his win rate of 25 percent from a large sample, and Overandabeauty looked in good shape after posting a bullet work a week earlier.

With an abundance of two-year-old races scheduled this Saturday, there are two runners whose pedigree stats compare favorably to the three winners mentioned above. The first is PARQUET, who will run in the 1ST race at Delaware Park. Like Devereux, Parquet is a son of Forestry and he is out of Double Sunrise (Slew O'Gold (SPI 2.76) whose DPI of 10.09 is mostly due to being the dam of 2000 Breeders' Cup Sprint (G1) winner and champion sprinter Kona Gold. A $510,000 yearling purchase, Parquet will be making her second start, at which her trainer Alan Goldberg shows a 14 percent strike-rate.

The second well-bred juvenile to watch for on Saturday is VINSTAR in the 3RD at Presque Isle Downs. By Vindication, who, being a freshman sire, has not had enough runners to qualify for a SPI but owns a 23 per cent record with his first-time starters, Vinstar will be debuting for Steve Asmussen who is 20 percent in this situation. Vinstar's dam, Fashion Star (Chief's Crown 2.74 SPI), is responsible for Eddington who won the 2005 Pimlico Special H. (G1), which explains her DPI of 7.14.


[ Sign-up ] [ Products & Prices ] [ Bookstore ] [ Track Info ]

[ Library ] [ Tech Support ] [ F.A.Q. ] [ Member Services ] [ Contact Us ]

handicapping insight

HANDICAPPING INSIGHTS (reprinted from the FREE Handicapper's Edge newsletter) APRIL 20, 2007 by Dick Powell I like speed figures and use the BRIS Speed ratings in my handicapping. That said, I have often questioned whether slow-paced races can ever earn big speed figures. And after last Saturday's Blue Grass S. (G1), it's more of a question than racing over Polytrack. Twenty years ago, many handicappers liked Theatrical (Ire) in the Breeders' Cup Turf (G1). One reason why was that his chief rival, Manila, had just earned a relatively slow speed figure in the Turf Classic (G1). Manila's problem was not that he was slower than Theatrical but that he came out of a very slow-paced race where the first six furlongs were run in 1:16 and change. They finished up in 1:11, but that only resulted in the 1 1/2 miles being run in 2:27 and change; thus, the low speed figure. Pace might not always make the race, but pace certainly makes the speed figure. The simple fact is that fast-paced races tend to yield higher speed figures than slow-paced races. BRIS now gives you Race Shapes that highlight how fast the leaders are going. Combined with the BRIS Pace figures, you can quickly gauge the pace scenario of previous races. By all accounts, the Blue Grass was slower than normal. The winner, DOMINICAN (El Corredor), only earned a BRIS Speed figure of 98. But with a first half run in :51.46, what else would you expect? Correctly predicted by ESPN's Randy Moss on their telecast, there was no pace to this field and all the riders decided to take back at the start leaving Edgar Prado aboard Teuflesberg (Johannesburg) on the lead. Nobody wanted the lead, and the reason was the belief that you can't win at Keeneland going two turns if you go to the front. BRIS Track Bias Stats reinforce this notion, with only one front-end winner from 18 races going two turns over the Polytrack. With the field tightly packed, they hit six furlongs in 1:16.65, with only about seven lengths covering the seven horses. The running got serious when they turned for home, and Teuflesberg held on grimly. Zanjero (Cherokee Run) ducked to the inside, Street Sense (Street Cry [Ire]) was battling to his outside and Great Hunter (Aptitude) was trying to split horses with a furlong to go. Teuflesberg veered out inside the furlong pole, forcing Corey Nakatani to take up aboard 9-5 second choice Great Hunter. Street Sense was battling gamely and looked like he would get up, but here came Dominican on the far outside under a furious drive by Rafael Bejarano. Four horses hit the wire and Dominican had his nose down on the outside of Street Sense. Zanjero finished a head back in third and Teuflesberg held on for fourth. Great Hunter checked in fifth, less than two lengths behind the winner despite a very rough trip. Like most of this year's Kentucky Derby (G1) preps, the Blue Grass raised more questions than it answered. Obviously with a full starting gate of 20 on the first Saturday of May, there's no chance that we would see the same pace scenario that we saw at Keeneland. Do we penalize the five runners that are going on to the Derby since they all ran "slow?" Is Dominican a Polytrack specialist? All three of his wins have come over the artificial surface, but can his sudden form reversal be attributed to his being gelded before this season? Regardless of the pace or surface, Dominican's final furlong was breath-taking and he was a good third over the Churchill Downs main track last November in the Kentucky Jockey Club S. (G2). He might be more versatile than given credit for. Did Street Sense get enough out of a race that turned into a quarter-mile sprint to the wire? With his campaign of only two prep races, there's not a lot of room for error. Why did he duck in during the stretch run? Would Zanjero have won if he went to the outside instead of the rail down the stretch? If the Blue Grass is a throw-out race – one that can be ignored since valid conclusions are impossible to draw – then how do we gauge the lightly-raced entrants that go to the Derby with only two or three prep races? As for the criticism of Polytrack, would you prefer four horses with their heads down on the wire or Sinister Minister winning last year's Blue Grass by 12 3/4 lengths and earning a 116 BRIS Speed rating? That race was as phony a Derby prep as we have ever seen. Give me last Saturday's Blue Grass any day. Oaklawn Park ran the Arkansas Derby (G2) last Saturday about an hour after the Blue Grass and even though it was dominated by CURLIN (Smart Strike), it still raised some questions. Can a horse that has not started as a juvenile win the Kentucky Derby? Can a horse with only three lifetime starts win it? How good are the horses that Curlin dominated in his two Oaklawn starts for new trainer Steve Asmussen? Based on what I saw, the answer to all three questions is a resounding "Yes!" Curlin broke well for Robby Albarado, sat on the inside while saving ground behind a modest pace, cruised up to take the lead on the far turn, then threw in a final furlong of :11.91 to draw off and win by 10 1/2 lengths. He earned a BRIS Speed rating of 102 and goes to Kentucky as one of the most interesting Derby starters we've seen in years. Originally trained by Helen Pitts, Curlin did not make his career debut until February 3 at Gulfstream when he decimated a field of eight three-year-olds going seven furlongs. The race was so impressive that he was purchased privately for a reported $3.5 million by a group that promptly turned him over to Asmussen. Not only has he won all three starts by wide margins in fast times, but he looked good doing it. He has natural gate speed, settles immediately for Albarado and then has endless energy in the stretch. I'm not saying he's my Derby pick, but leave him out at your own risk.