THIRD FINGER FUND LLC by, @BMDPicksHorses

Brandon M. Dolin

Website of @BMDPICKSHORSES BETS AND BETTING ADVICE. Soon to be sole manager of The 3rd Finger Fund LLC a NV Betting Entity ; Horse Racing & Sports Betting.

Note @ Las Vegas, Nevada

decades ago greatly enhanced my love of horse racing in general, thus I've retained some interest in what occurs on the Standardbred scene.

After getting my feet wet during the 1986 Thoroughbred meet at Canterbury (age nine), I really dove in to horse racing head first when the track conducted a financially unsuccessful harness meet that fall. Not only was the racing conveniently held in the evening (Friday night visits after a long week of school were a blast), but I gained my first exposure to reading and interpreting past performances from harness programs. Another fond memory from that time was getting an early peek at a budding star of the sulky, future Hall of Fame driver Ron Pierce.

I became a devout follower of Thoroughbred racing the following year, yet still retained an interest in harness racing. Over the next several years I made sure to take in the sport at Los Alamitos in California and Sportsman's Park in Chicago when I happened to be in the area, and would often stay up late at night to hear Tony Salvaro give harness results from the Chicago tracks on WBBM-AM. As the years went by, though, it became more difficult to keep tabs on harness racing with its limited television exposure and with no live racing locally.

That all changed when I came to Kentucky for school and, later, moved to the Lexington area. Having the Red Mile (which I first visited in 1992) in your backyard is the Standardbred equivalent of living next to Saratoga, at least during the track's two-week Grand Circuit meet in September and October. It's a shame those eight days of racing are not a bigger deal in the community.

Aside from the fact I've worked for Thoroughbred-oriented organizations and taking a mid-week trip to Delaware, Ohio, for the Jug was almost always impractical, I have to admit going there, while on my bucket list, has not been an imperative goal. Some of that feeling perhaps stems from the fact all the action has been readily and conveniently available on TwinSpires.comfor many years, as well as that nearly all the major runners from the Jug and other stakes would be arriving Lexington the following week anyway.

When my colleague Ed DeRosa, a native Ohioan, suggested we take in the Jug this year, which will be this coming Thursday, September 22, I didn't even have to think twice about it. Aside from numerous Kentucky Futurities at the Red Mile, this will easily be the biggest harness race I've ever witnessed in person, and with a crowd generally around 50,000 it is always the most highly-attended race of its kind in the country.

The county fair atmosphere, the lightning-fast half-mile strip, and the boisterous race calls by "The Voice" Roger Huston, a veteran of nearly 50 Jugs, are among the things I'm looking forward to next Thursday. Reigning Horse of the Year and fan favorite Wiggle It Jiggleit, who won last year's Jug, is also expected be on hand for viewing and photos at the LBJ barn.

It should be a terrific day of racing, and you can follow along on the TwinSpires Twitter feed and Blog as Ed and I bring you the sights and sounds of Jug Day 2016. I'll have more to write about Jug Day when fields are drawn over the next several days, but until then how about a little Glenn Miller to get us "in the mood."


Best Bets of the Weekend: Woodbine Stakes Selections | America's Best Racing

Best Bets of the Weekend: Woodbine Stakes Selections

Gambling
September 16th, 2016 by Monique Vág
Dacita runs in Saturday's Canadian Stakes at Woodbine. (Eclipse Sportswire)

America’s Best Racing and handicapper (and avid gambler) Monique Vág team up to provide horseplayers with their best bets of the weekend in this regular feature blog.

For some posts, Vág will try to identify a longshot play of the weekend, a nice opportunity to swing for the fences on a win bet or to take a shot with a show bet. She also will look for strong exacta plays for the weekend or occasionally try to spot a nice opportunity for other wagers.

This Weekend’s Bets

Exacta Box

Saturday, Race 3, Woodbine, 1:55 p.m. ET

#6 Vanish: It's hard not to think connections think highly of this horse entering him in his first career race after only three workouts, the first being Aug. 19. His workouts seem to be very similar to others in here and although I would prefer to see him with a career start, I think it's tough to overlook a good pedigree and strong training connections.

#9 Yorkton: This colt was well bet in his career debut and put up a good speed rating while finishing a length and a half off the winner. I like that he's already had racing experience in general, and I think it's an added bonus that they have been over the all-weather surface. This colt seems to show enough speed and quick workouts to lead me to believe he will be sent hard out of the starting gate. For those reasons, drawing post No. 9 isn't the worst. He has a good shot.

#7 Tricky Gamble: It's hard not to respect Josie Carroll horses racing at Woodbine. She sends them out ready and a lot of them seem to take well to the all-weather surface. I'm not sure if this colt won't prefer a longer distance, but I think he fits well with this company. He's been working out anywhere from three furlongs to six. Certainly capable to strike on first asking.

Best Bet

Saturday, Race 4, Woodbine, Ontario Derby, 2:24 p.m. ET

#6 Ami's Gizmo: Ignore this colt's last race, I just don't think he took well to the turf and moved a little too early. Pay more attention to the record at Woodbine over the all-weather surface against entirely stakes company. Narrowly lost Woodbine's marquee event for 3-year-olds, the Queen's Plate, by half a length. I don't think the outside post in that was best suited for him, but nonetheless he ran a big race. He'll want the lead in here today and will probably sit up front just off uncontested fractions. His race to lose.

Best Bet

Saturday, Race 8, Woodbine, Canadian Stakes, 4:30 p.m. ET

#2 Dacita: There's no denying she's in tough today, however her last two performances are certainly special. Last time out she closed from 10 lengths back to win the Grade 1 Diana. Two back she beat the super-talented Sea Calisi who went on next start to win the Grade 1 Beverly D. Stakes. It's hard not be impressed by her resume. Irad Ortiz Jr. will probably have the choice of positioning her wherever he wants (due to drawing post No. 2) and I think she can win from anywhere.

Longshot Play

Sunday, Race 5, Belmont Park, 3:36 p.m. ET

#10 Cats Halo: I'm looking to swing for the fences in a wide open maiden claiming field. I think most in here have a legitimate shot, but I find myself intrigued by this filly. I think her best efforts have been over the turf surface and I like that she will likely be involved early today. She's been bet in quite a few of her starts, but hasn't really ever been much of a factor entering the stretch. I actually think the extra couple of furlongs she's entered in today work to her advantage. She's worth a closer look at b

Related News

Another Big One For Dark Angel as Harry Angel Takes the Mill Reef


Another Big One For Dark Angel as Harry Angel Takes the Mill Reef

Saturday, September 17, 2016 | Back to: Europe,Top News
3rd atNBY, Gr. Stk, £75,000G2 Dubai Duty Free Mill Reef S.(6f 8y)Winner: Harry Angel (Ire), c, 2 by Dark Angel (Ire)
harryangelrp_res

Harry Angel | Racing Post

HARRY ANGEL (IRE), c, 2, Dark Angel (Ire)–Beatrix Potter (Ire), by Cadeaux Genereux (GB).
O-Peter Ridgers; B-CBS Bloodstock (IRE); T-Clive Cox; J-Adam Kirby. £42,533. Lifetime Record: 2-1-1-0, £44,843.
Backed into 2-1 favouritism despite being the only member of the seven-strong cast not to have won, Harry Angel who caught the eye when second over five furlongs at Ascot on his sole start May 7 proved up to the hype to secure this prestigious prize which was weakened by the withdrawal of Mokarris (More Than Ready) due to rain-softened ground. Keen early under restraint in fourth, the bay moved forward to lead with 1 1/2 furlongs remaining and quickly settled the result. At the line, he had 2 1/2 lengths to spare over Perfect Angel (Ire) (Dark Angel {Ire}), with a neck back to Global Applause (GB) (Mayson {GB}) in third.

Tepin Tough to Topple in Woodbine Mile

Tepin Tough to Topple in Woodbine Mile


Tepin by the morning light | WEG/Michael Burns

By Alan Carasso

Trainer Mark Casse has been leading trainer at Woodbine Racetrack no fewer than 11 times in a career that led to an induction into the Canadian Racing Hall of Fame earlier this season. But never has his name graced the trophy given out for the GI Ricoh Woodbine Mile, a wrong he will hope to right when he sends out reigning Eclipse Award-winning turf female Tepin (Bernstein) Saturday afternoon.

The Robert Masterson colorbearer would be in search of a 13th straight victory were it not for a pair of excruciating losses at Saratoga during the summer of 2015 and makes his sixth trip to the post this season in the Mile. No better than 2-5 in any of her first four starts this term, the bay was a comparitively generous 11-2 shot in the G1 Queen Anne S. at Royal Ascot June 14. She never really seemed at home over the very easy going, but came to win her race a furlong from home and lasted by a half-length. Connections report she has come back into her best form over the last several weeks and she’s strictly the one to beat at an unbettable quote.

Tepin will look to become just the second female to defeat the boys in the Woodbine Mile, joining Ventura (Chester House), who accomplished the feat in 2009 after finishing runner-up the year prior. Though he has never won the Mile, Casse sent out Kaigun (Northern Afleet) to a close second-place finish in this event in 2014.

European raiders have taken out the last two runnings of the Mile with Trade Storm (GB) (Trade Fair {GB}) and Mondialiste (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) and field a talented trio this time around. Mutakayyef (GB) (Sea The Stars {Ire}) was beaten a neck by Mondialiste in the 2015 G3 Strensall S. and won this year’s G2 Summer Mile at Ascot July 9 ahead of a strong third to Postponed (Ire) (Dubawi {Ire}) in the G1 Juddmonte International S. over an extended 10-furlong trip eight days later. Arod (Ire) (Teofilo {Ire}), the 2015 Summer Mile winner and a close second to Solow (Ire) (Singspiel {Ire}), is not without a puncher’s chance off a decent third in Goodwood’s G2 Celebration Mile Aug. 27.Mr. Owen (Invincible Spirit {Ire}), a Pennsylvania-bred son of 2007 GI E.P. Taylor S. winner Mrs. Lindsay (Theatrical {Ire}), but based overseas, makes his second consecutive appearance in the Mile, having finished a midpack sixth behind Mondialiste last September

How to Use the Superfecta Bet

 

How to Use the Superfecta Bet

TIPS
August 21st, 2016 BY Bob Ehalt
(Penelope P. Miller/America's Best Racing)

The superfecta might seem like an imposing wager. If you struggle to hit an exacta - where you need to predict just the first two finishers - it’s understandable to view picking the first four finishers in order as an impossible dream.

Yet the feared superfecta can actually have a strategic role in your wagering, largely because of its minimal cost. With a 10-cent minimum wager at many tracks, you can drop a lot of dimes in building a ticket that cover a lot of bases for a relatively small amount of dollars.

Admittedly, the 10-cent superfecta will not pay off like a 20-cent Rainbow Pick 6 ticket, but you can certainly turn a nice profit off a modest wager.

The key part of playing the superfecta involves how you build your ticket and what sticks out as the focus of your wager.

For example, if you like four horses in the race, you can box them and it will cost you just $2.40 for 10-cent tickets or $24 for a $1 base wager.

Of course, that leaves you with little margin for error. Increasing the number of horses in that box will increase your protection but it will also drive up the cost of the ticket rather dramatically. A five-horse box sells for $12 (10 cents) and $120 ($1) and a six-horse box will cost $36 and $360, respectively.

Conversely, keying a horse in one spot will give you plenty of room to add horses in the other spots. For instance, if you believe a horse will win, playing it alone to win and using six horses in each of the other three spots will cost $12 for 10-cent bets and $120 for $1.

Expanding the wager from spot to spot is a more economical way of playing the superfecta while building in coverage.

Let’s say you like one horse to win, believe three can finish second, four third and five fifth, that 1 x 3 x 4 x 5 ticket will cost only $2.70 for a dime and $27 for $1. You can also reverse the bet for the same cost by going 3 x 4 x 5 x 1.

Another model might involve liking one horse to win and one to finish fourth. If you bookend them around eight horses in the second and third spots, the cost will be $4.20 for 10 cents and $42 for $1.

Taking it to another angle, if you believe two horses can finish 1-2, you can use just them in the top two spots and eight horses for third and fourth at a cost of $11.20 for 10 cents and $112 for $1. If you make it a cold exacta in a 1 x 1 x 8 x 8 play, the cost is cut in half to $5.60 and $56.

You can also cut the cost of both of those lays in half by reducing the horses in the last two spots to four.

Whatever tactic you use, thanks to the low minimum wager, it should be clear that trying to hit a superfecta might not be as difficult as it seems.

It’s hardly a snap, but at 10 cents a try, there’s surely no need to commiserate with Don Quixote

When to Take a Stand Against the Favorite | America's Best Racing

When to Take a Stand Against the Favorite

Tips
August 14th, 2016 by Bob Ehalt
Fans watch the horses race in the stretch at Saratoga Race Course. (Penelope P. Miller/America's Best Racing)

There was a valuable lesson contained within a $411,188.06 payout in Gulfstream Park’s Rainbow Pick 6 Jackpot on Aug. 6.

The handicapping genius who was the only one to correctly select all six winners made excellent use of a $2,160 bankroll, electing to use 10 of the 11 horses in one of the races.

While it’s hardly unusual for a Pick 6 player to wheel a race (using all of the horses in that race) or include virtually all of the horses, what stood out here was the horse left off the ticket was the favorite in the race.

And that’s why they call it gambling.

By taking a stand against the favorite – who finished fifth – that handicapper wound up having the $59.40 winner on that ticket and was ultimately rewarded with a life-changing payoff.

While cashing a Pick 6 ticket would be a dream come true for a modest player, anyone can benefit from the wagering strategy and confidence that went into that huge payday at Gulfstream Park.

As much as some handicappers like to focus their wagers on favorites so that they can cash a winning ticket more often, these chalk players are actually working against the odds. Even if favorites win 33 percent of the time, that means they lose 67 percent of the time.

It’s those numbers that illustrate why a handicapper would always be wise to exploit a vulnerable favorite. You’re chasing bigger payoffs, and, yes, about 67 percent of the time it makes sense to bet against the chalk.

While a handicapper should always strive to pick winners, sometimes it can work out just as well when you find a race where you do not like the favorite. By spreading your wagers a little more than usual in that race, you just might cash a ticket that puts you in the black for the rest of the day.

And if you’re worried that the horse everyone but you seems to like will beat you, remember, about 67 percent of the time that horse will lose. So go ahead, take a chance.

In case you have forgotten already, that’s why they call it gambling.

To help in understanding when it makes sense to latch on to a favorite or avoid it like a cold, let’s take a look at what’s happening at the “Graveyard of Favorites," Saratoga Race Course – which is actually embracing the chalk in a manner more befitting Aqueduct’s inner-track meet.

From July 22 through Aug. 12, there have been 187 races at the Spa – not including steeplechase events. In those races, the betting favorite has prevailed in 72 of them, which amounts to a very respectable rate of 38.5 percent.

With so many favorites crossing the finish line first, it would seem like nirvana for chalk players. But if they tried to stretch their luck into the exotics, they are no doubt struggling.

While betting the two favorites in an exacta might seem quite sensible while you’re analyzing past performances, in reality betting on the two favorites in a race, in the long run, accounts for low payoffs and a low winning percentage.

As much as the second choice has indeed wound up second behind the favorite more often than any other option in the wagering, your chances of cashing on the chalk running 1-2 are less than you might think.

Of those 72 wins by favorites at Saratoga, on 25 occasions the second choice finished second. That might sound good in theory, but it averages out to a chalk exacta happening 13.7 percent of the time – which is a rather low mark considering that 11 of those exactas paid $10.80 or less.

Interestingly, playing the second choice over the favorite in the exacta has generated much weaker results as it has happened just nine times, or 4.8% of the time.  Box the two favorites and you’re winning at a rate of just 18.2% (34 of 187) – which means you’re losing 81.8% of the time.

What can help in putting those numbers to work for you is an understanding of when the favorite is more likely to shine or stub its toe.

In breaking those numbers down by the categories of races, turf claiming races have been a weak area for favorites.

So far favorites have been victorious in just 22.7 percent of turf claimers (5 of 22 races) and have been first or second in 10 of the 22 races (45.5%).

Favorites, like Frosted, have done well in dirt stakes. (Eclipse Sportswire)

In contrast, the chalk has thrived in dirt claimers. Favorites have won 17 of 35 (48.5%) main-track claiming races and have been first or second in 25 of those 35 races for a stellar mark of 71.4%.

Favorites have also excelled in dirt stakes, where they have won 7 of 15 races (46.6%) and been first or second 12 of 15 times (75%), and turf stakes, where favorites have won 6 of 9 races (66.6%) with no runner-up finishes.

If you’re looking for an opportunity to cast a “thumbs down" on a favorite, the best spots have been maiden special weight races on dirt (1 for 5, 20%), maiden special weight races for New York state-breds on dirt (0 for 4), starter allowance races on turf (0 for 4) and allowance races on turf (4 of 14, 28.5%).

Keep all of those numbers in mind the next time you stumble across a favorite that you don’t like. Rather than follow the pack and reluctantly back it, by sticking to your first instincts, you’ll actually have the percentages on your side and you could be staring at your big payoff of the day.

Yes, taking a gamble can certainly have its rewards, even if you’re not playing the Pick 6.

Related News

TEPIN ADDS SOME SPICE TO THE WOODBINE RICOH MILE

TEPIN ADDS SOME SPICE TO THE WOODBINE RICOH MILE!

By: Ed DeRosa on September 16, 2016
There are not many peppers hotter than a TePin, and there aren’t many horses hotter than Tepin right now, either, as the reigning champion turf female and Royal Ascot heroine brings her international road show to Woodbine for the Ricoh Mile on Saturday, September 17. For FREE Brisnet PPs, CLICK HERE.

The Woodbine Mile has not suffered for star power in recent years with Horse of the Year Wise Dan winning in 2013-2014 and future Arlington Million winner Mondialiste taking the race last year. Still, even with those big names shipping to Canada to take one of that country’s top prize, it’s impossible to deny that Tepin brings a little extra heat given that she is putting her 7-race winning streak on the line against males.

“She’s a superstar, and she embraces it,” said assistant trainer Norm Casse, whose dad trains the five-year-old Bernstein mare for Robert Masterson. “She soaks up the media attention and likes the fans to come and see her.

“She was anointed ‘Queen of the Turf’ by [Churchill Downs announcer] Travis Stone when she won on Kentucky Derby day.”

Annexing the Woodbine Mile would not only embellish her resume for another Eclipse Award—she’s won all five starts this year including two Grade 1s—but also provide a key victory for team Casse.

“I’m really excited about the possibility of winning the Woodbine Mile,” Casse said. “It’s a race that has eluded dad so far. When we brought her back this year, one of our main goals was to come back and win what I think is Woodbine’s marquee race.”

That the Woodbine Mile has eluded the Casses is saying something considering the team has won nine consecutive training titles as well as other major prizes here such as the Queen’s Plate, E.P. Taylor, and Woodbine Oaks.

The Woodbine Mile is the last of 12 races and anchors guaranteed Pick 4 and Pick 5 pools. Post time is 6:39 p.m. EDT

Wall Street’s 0.01%: The Guru Who Only Talks to Hedge-Fund Elite - Bloomberg

Wall Street’s 0.01%: The Guru Who Only Talks to Hedge-Fund Elite

A new financial elite is emerging on Wall Street. And if you're not part of it, the next best thing is to sell to it.

September 15, 2016
by  

Jens Nordvig, one of the hottest prognosticators in finance, will sell anyone his secret sauce for winning trades for $30,000 a year.

But if you want unfettered access to his best ideas and personal touch—the kind that the deep-pocketed hedge funds covet—be prepared to shell out about 20 times more.

That two-pronged approach to research, off-limits (at least officially) at Wall Street banks, captures one of the most striking shifts in finance today: the rise of a class system where entire businesses cater to only the highest-paying clients. Of course, haves and have-nots have long existed in the world of finance. But the widening gap within Wall Street itself, between what the privileged few and most others get, is creating a new financial elite—what amounts to the 1 percent of the 1 percent.

And if you’re not part of the 0.01 percent, the next best thing is to sell to it.

“Investors either get personalized advice from someone they really trust, or it’s the data tools, good robots—and the price of those two things are different,” the 42-year-old Dane explained from his WeWork office in Manhattan’s Flatiron district one recent afternoon.

For Nordvig, who left Nomura Holdings Inc. in January after five years as Wall Street’s top-ranked currency strategist, it meant leveraging that standing to build his firm, Exante Data, around a rarefied group of the brightest hedge-fund names— and the money they dole out.

 
Jens Nordvig, chief executive officer of Exante Data LLC in the Flatiron WeWork offices in New York.
 
 
Jens Nordvig, chief executive officer of Exante Data LLC in the Flatiron WeWork offices in New York.
 
Photographer: Christopher Goodney/Bloomberg
 
 

Exante counts Key Square, founded by George Soros protege Scott Bessent, and Adam Levinson’s Graticule, a Singapore-based firm spun out of Fortress Investment Group, among its clients, according to conversations with investors and people familiar with the matter. Graticule didn’t reply to requests for comment.

Nordvig declined to identify specific firms, but says there are just “five to seven” large institutions, whose fees covered most of his startup costs. And by design, he isn’t accepting any new business. That’s because while Exante’s six employees are focused on its analytics rollout, Nordvig devotes the majority of his time advising his marquee customers.

He’s in touch with them on an almost daily basis and is just a phone call or instant message away—any time, 24/7. His research is tailor-made to suit each one’s needs and Nordvig says he’ll often spend hours at a time with a single firm debating macroeconomic policy and trade strategies.

In late July, Nordvig was up until midnight defending his high-stakes call to a hedge-fund client in Asia that the Bank of Japan would stand pat, rather than announce a new set of aggressive stimulus measures as everyone expected. (He dissuaded the firm from shorting the yen, which proved to be prescient as the Japanese currency surged following the non-event.)

squiggly line mask
“At banks, it’s mass production. It’s Target versus Hermès.”

“At banks, it’s mass production. It’s Target versus Hermès.”

“At banks, it’s mass production. It’s Target versus Hermès.”

So far, his backers like what they see.

“Jens is one of the great thinkers in the market,” said Key Square’s Bessent, who oversaw Soros’ personal fortune before starting his own billion-dollar macro fund this year. “Part of what we did was we got him to control his number of clients. At banks, it’s mass production. It’s Target versus Hermès.”

Nordvig isn’t shy about what he brings to the table. Prior to his years at Nomura, he spent almost a decade at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., where he rose to become co-head of global currency research and made his name with bold calls and savvy analysis. In between, he did a brief stint at Ray Dalio’s Bridgewater Associates. And Nordvig brushes off the perception among both admirers and critics that he can, at times, be just a bit too brazen in promoting himself. To him, it’s just part of the cutthroat nature of finance.

“I have a track record of being quite detail-oriented, precise in my analysis and also able to develop new frameworks for thinking about things, and at the same time being quite pragmatic,” he said. “I’ve set up the advisory business so that the people I deal with are some of the biggest macro investors in the world, and I know their interests fit with how I think.”

Whatever the case, there is little doubt the appetite for bespoke research like Nordvig’s is growing. Banks are slashing costs, cutting jobs and abandoning their ambitions to be all things to all customers in the face of a slew of regulations over issues like selective access and excessive risk-taking. An industry-wide slump in revenue since the financial crisis has also prompted bank executives to rethink the value of the commission-based model, where investment research is offered for free in return for trade orders.

Many firms have eliminated analysts as they scale back research spending—making personalized service and attention all the more valuable. Some like Citigroup Inc. and Morgan Stanley have drawn up preferred client lists with code names such as “Focus Five” and “supercore” for top clients.

“It’s a changing landscape,” said Matthew Feldmann, a consultant at Scepter Partners, a multi-family office, and a former money manager at Citadel and Brevan Howard. “People like Jens have found a niche area where all you need is a few wealthy individual customers.”

 
a
 
   
a
 
   
 
The Guru Serving Wall Street's Top 0.01%
 
 
squiggly line mask
 
“People like Jens have found a niche area where all you need is a few wealthy individual customers.”
 
 
“People like Jens have found a niche area where all you need is a few wealthy individual customers.”
 
Photographer: Christopher Goodney/Bloomberg
 
 

Perhaps just as important is the proliferation of automated trading strategies and machine-driven data mining, which has replaced many traditional roles that used to exist on Wall Street (not to mention made it harder for hedge funds to outperform as technology makes financial data almost ubiquitous).

Nordvig’s old job at Goldman Sachs exemplified that bygone era. As recently as 2007, he’d stand in the middle of the trading floor with mic in hand on the first Friday of every month, just before the 8:30 a.m. payrolls report. His task? Shout out his immediate take. If the U.S. added more jobs than expected, he’d cry “buy dollar-yen!” and within seconds, Goldman Sachs’s traders would hit the button on their keyboards to put in the order.

“We used to be able to make so much money by just being fast,” he said. Yet today, it’s all done by robots.

Amid the upheaval, Nordvig is confident his experience and smarts will ensure his high-priced advice remains in demand. But he’s not taking any chances.

After years of lackluster returns and faced with the biggest withdrawals since the financial crisis, hedge funds are looking for any edge they can find. These days, that often comes from the world of quantitative analysis. Even legendary names like Paul Tudor Jones, who made their fortunes the old-fashioned way, are hiring a bevy of programmers and mathematicians to build out more sophisticated, computer-driven strategies.

But not everybody has the research budgets to hire scores of Ph.D.s or pay for Nordvig’s white-glove service. That’s where the “data” in Exante Data comes in (Exante is derived from “ex ante,” Latin for “before the event”). Plenty of research superstars have decamped from Wall Street to set up boutique advisory firms, but Exante’s two-tier model is rare. Once the data business is fully up and running, Nordvig promises to give mere mortals on Wall Street the same type of data-mining tools once available only to the biggest quant shops.

squiggly line mask
Nordvig says he has one overriding advantage: he simply understands markets better.

Nordvig says he has one overriding advantage: he simply understands markets better.

Nordvig says he has one overriding advantage: he simply understands markets better.

Yet competition on the data front is heating up. Scores of startups are already scraping data and turning the information into actionable ideas. Goldman Sachs is the biggest investor in Kensho Technologies Inc., which analyzes historical trading patterns to predict how assets react to events like policy meetings and economic releases. An outfit called SpaceKnow Inc. uses satellite images of factories to gauge economic activity in export-oriented countries like China.

Nordvig, in his typical cocksure manner, says he has one overriding advantage: he simply understands markets better.

In coming months, Exante will launch its first data product for the masses. According to Nordvig, his data scientists have come up with a complex algorithm that precisely estimates how much the yuan exchange rate is influenced by China’s buying or selling of dollars, on a daily basis.

There’s nothing publicly available that comes close to measuring intervention in such detail. But Nordvig says his algo succeeds because it can capture anomalies in yuan trading, like a sudden widening in bid-ask spreads, and then compare the data against freely-traded markets in big financial centers.

While the tool can’t yet gauge intervention in offshore yuan and currency forwards, his backtested results show it closely tracks less frequently released official figures. And knowing beforehand can make a huge difference. Case in point: In August 2015, the People’s Bank of China unexpectedly engineered a weakening of the yuan, which blindsided investors and sent financial markets worldwide into a tailspin.

“This is about knowing what topics are important to the clients you serve,” Nordvig said.